ABC Data: The Key to Understanding Behavior
ABC data is one of the most powerful tools in Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). It gives you a clear framework for understanding why behavior happens by capturing the events that occur before (A), during (B), and after (C) a behavior. Whether you're trying to reduce challenging behavior or strengthen new skills, ABC data provides the foundation you need to make informed, effective decisions.
Professionals often call ABC data the three-term contingency. Each component — antecedent, behavior, consequence — plays a key role in determining why a behavior continues over time. When you understand this relationship, you can design Behavior Intervention Plans (BIPs), guide Functional Behavior Assessments (FBAs), and support skill development with far greater precision.
Although ABC data is most commonly discussed in the context of behavior reduction, it is equally valuable in skill acquisition. Behavior follows natural, predictable laws, whether the behavior is something you want to increase or decrease. The principles don’t change — only the context does.
Key Takeaways
ABC data captures the context of behavior by recording what happens immediately before and after the target behavior.
It is structured yet flexible, allowing for narrative detail or checkbox-style reporting depending on the situation.
Clear behavior definitions are essential for accurate and consistent data collection.
Identifying patterns in antecedents and consequences helps pinpoint why behavior occurs.
Multiple data points matter — one instance rarely reveals a full pattern.
ABC data lays the foundation for FBAs and helps practitioners form hypotheses about behavioral function.
What Is ABC Data? (The 3-Term Contingency Explained)
ABC data describes the context of behavior in real-world environments. Instead of relying on assumptions or subjective impressions, it gives you observable, objective information about:
what triggers the behavior
what the behavior looks like
what happens afterward
Because ABC data is collected in natural settings, it helps reveal authentic patterns that might be missed in contrived assessments. Martens et al. (2008) highlight several advantages of descriptive assessments, including flexibility, ecological validity, and the ability to uncover idiosyncratic variables unique to each learner.
ABC data is useful for:
identifying behavioral functions
understanding motivation
designing effective interventions
improving teaching strategies
creating or refining BIPs
supporting FBAs and FA decision-making
Understanding the Components of ABC Data
ABC data has four major components: antecedent, behavior, consequence, and setting events. Each reveals a different part of the behavioral puzzle.
Antecedent (A)
The antecedent refers to what happens moments before the behavior, usually within 30 seconds. You can think of it as the trigger, or the event that sets the behavior into motion.
Common antecedents include:
Demands or task presentation
Restricted or removed attention
Denied access to a preferred item
Environmental changes (lighting, noise, temperature)
Transitions
Unstructured downtime
Understanding antecedents means asking questions like:
Where was the learner?
What was happening at the time?
Who was present?
What sensory or environmental conditions were in place?
What did the adult say or do immediately before the behavior?
Antecedents in Skill Acquisition (SDs)
In teaching, the antecedent often functions as a discriminative stimulus (SD). The SD signals that reinforcement is available for a specific response.
For example:
SD: “Clap.”
Behavior: Learner claps.
Consequence: Reinforcement is delivered.
Over time, this builds stimulus control, the backbone of all learning.
Behavior (B)
The “behavior” in ABC data is the specific action you want to understand. It may be desirable or undesirable, simple or complex.
Operational Definitions Matter
To collect accurate data, behavior must be defined in clear, observable, measurable terms. Anyone who reads the definition should be able to identify the behavior with accuracy.
Example: Operational Definition of Throwing
Throwing: Any instance in which Henry moves objects not intended to be thrown through space more than one foot using any part of his body.
Examples include:
Pushing items off a shelf or table
Throwing a marker more than one foot
Kicking a bucket and dumping its contents
Holding an inset puzzle upside down and dropping the pieces
Non-examples include:
Dumping puzzle pieces onto a table while sitting
Throwing a ball in the gross motor area
For additional examples, see our post: Operational Definitions: Clearly Define the Behavior.
Consequence (C)
The consequence is what happens immediately after the behavior. Although some consequences may occur much later, ABC data focuses on what happens right away.
Common consequences include:
Attention (reprimands, discussions, praise)
Escape from a task or sensory experience
Access to preferred items or activities
These consequences help you identify the possible function of behavior:
Attention
Escape/Avoidance
Access to tangibles
Automatic reinforcement
Misconceptions About Consequences
Many commonly recommended strategies — such as 1-2-3 Magic or time-outs — can accidentally reinforce problem behavior if the consequence aligns with the learner’s motivation.
For example:
If a child misbehaves to escape work, then a time-out rewards the escape, reinforcing the behavior.
Setting Events (The “Fourth Term”)
Setting events occur hours, days, or even longer before the behavior — but still influence how the learner responds to antecedents.
Common setting events include:
Fatigue
Hunger
Medication changes
Illness
Stress
Presence/absence of a specific person
Changes in routine
Environmental conditions (noise, temperature)
Setting events help explain why behavior occurs on some days but not others. For example, poor rapport with a staff member has been shown to increase escape-maintained behavior (Magito McLaughlin & Carr, 2005).
To help identify these variables, download our Setting Events Checklist.
Understanding the Context of Behavior
ABC data allows you to examine the broader pattern of triggers and outcomes surrounding a behavior. By reviewing multiple instances, you begin to see predictable themes that reveal why the behavior occurs and what maintains it.
When analyzing your ABC data, ask:
Most Common Antecedents to Look For
A demand was placed
A preferred item was denied or removed
A transition occurred
The learner had no access to attention
Unstructured time or unclear expectations
Environmental triggers (noise, lights, crowding, temperature)
Someone said “no”
The learner was playing alone
A routine changed unexpectedly
Most Common Consequences to Look For
Reprimands, talking, or redirection
Adult attention delivered (even negative attention)
Demand removal or delay
Escape from a task or situation
Access to a preferred item or activity
Time-out or other “punishment” that accidentally reinforces escape
Adults attempting to negotiate or reason with the learner
Unintentional reinforcement (e.g., soothing, comforting, explaining)
Questions to Ask Yourself When Reviewing ABC Data
What consistently happens right before the behavior?
What consistently happens right after the behavior?
Do certain people or settings reliably trigger or reduce the behavior?
Does the learner gain something? Avoid something?
Is there a pattern related to time of day? Transitions? Attention?
You’re looking for patterns — repeated combinations of antecedents and consequences that reliably evoke and reinforce the behavior.
▶️ Watch: Understanding behavior in context with Amelia Dalphonse, MA, BCBA
Overt and Covert Behaviors
ABA primarily focuses on overt behaviors because they’re observable and measurable. However, covert behaviors (thoughts, feelings, internal events) can influence behavior even though they cannot be seen.
While covert behaviors cannot be recorded through ABC data, awareness of them can help you interpret patterns more compassionately. This is especially relevant when collaborating with mental health professionals or supporting learners with anxiety, trauma history, or internalizing disorders.
Using ABC Data for Behavior Reduction
One of the most common reasons practitioners collect ABC data is to reduce challenging behavior. By analyzing antecedents and consequences, you can form a hypothesis about the behavior’s function and begin designing effective interventions.
▶️ Watch: ABC data example — Ethan’s jumping behavior
Determining the Function of Behavior
ABC data helps you identify what the learner is getting from the behavior — the function. The four behavioral functions remain the same:
Attention
Escape/Avoidance
Access to tangibles
Automatic reinforcement
Sometimes, clear patterns emerge quickly. Other times, ABC data must be combined with:
caregiver or teacher interviews
rating scales and questionnaires
additional direct observation
systematic preference assessments
If you need support with determining behavioral function, see our post:
➡️ Functions of Behavior in ABA: Complete Guide
ABC Data for Skill Development
ABC data isn’t just for behavior reduction. It also provides valuable insight for skill acquisition.
By understanding:
which antecedents reliably evoke correct responses
how the learner responds to prompts
which consequences strengthen desired behaviors
what environmental variables support or hinder learning
…you can refine teaching strategies, reduce prompt dependency, and increase independence.
When a learner struggles to acquire a skill, revisit your ABC data and ask:
Is the SD clear and consistent?
Are consequences reinforcing enough?
Are prompts overshadowing the SD?
Does the learner need more frequent reinforcement?
Are setting events affecting performance?
ABC Data Collection Methods
Collecting accurate data requires being present when the behavior occurs — which isn't always easy. This is why relying solely on staged situations is problematic.
❌ Avoid staging behavior
This can:
increase stress for the learner
evoke behavior unnecessarily
create artificial data that misrepresents natural patterns
✔️ Instead:
Train people who spend the most time with the learner — teachers, parents, RBTs — to collect data reliably.
If video recordings are used, they should supplement, not replace, written ABC data.
How to Train Staff and Caregivers to Collect ABC Data
Caregiver- and staff-collected data is vulnerable to bias and observational errors. However, you can greatly improve accuracy by:
teaching operational definitions clearly
giving examples and non-examples
practicing with video samples
using checkboxes for new staff
using open-ended narrative forms for experienced staff
emphasizing non-punitive reporting (“You won’t get in trouble for what you write.”)
Providing a variety of data sheets is helpful. We recommend including:
structured checkbox-style ABC forms
open narrative ABC forms
SABC (Setting, Antecedent, Behavior, Consequence) forms
forms designed for multiple incidents per page
Download our templates here:
➡️ ABC & SABC Data Sheets
How Much ABC Data Do You Need?
There is no universal number of data points required. But in general:
Frequent behaviors reveal patterns faster
Infrequent behaviors require more time
Complex behaviors need more data for accuracy
Low-rate high-risk behaviors require extremely careful interpretation
Example: Sammy Shown Through 3 Days of Data
Day 1
One incident. Not enough information.
Day 2
Two incidents with similar antecedents — a possible pattern, but still not conclusive.
Day 3
Antecedent shifts, breaking the pattern — but when you note context (e.g., caregiver busy cooking), a new consistent theme emerges: reduced attention.
Lesson:
Patterns appear only after multiple data points and consideration of context. Don’t rush the conclusion.
ABC Data Collection Tools
Paper Templates
Advantages:
Easy to use
No technical skill required
Reliable in low-tech environments
Disadvantages:
Harder to analyze
Not mobile-friendly
Require transcription for reports or FBAs
Digital Options
You can create excellent ABC tools using:
Google Docs
Google Sheets
App-based solutions
Custom forms within agency software
Use whatever increases accuracy, consistency, and accessibility for your team.
ABC Data Collection Example
▶️ Watch: Father collecting ABC data for his son Ethan
From the collected data:
Antecedent: Ethan engages in the behavior when Tom’s attention is unavailable.
Consequence: Tom responds by giving Ethan attention — telling him to stop.
Even with limited data, the beginnings of a pattern emerge:
→ Behavior may be attention-maintained.
Of course, this is simplified for demonstration. More data is always recommended before drawing conclusions.
How to Analyze ABC Data for Meaningful Patterns
Understanding what ABC data looks like is only the first step. The real power comes from analyzing patterns across multiple events. When you compare antecedents, behaviors, and consequences over time, you start to see why the behavior continues—and which intervention strategies will be most effective.
Below is a practical guide to interpreting the data you’ve collected so you can move from raw observations to actionable insights, but first, watch this quick video on how you can save time analyzing your ABC data!
Identify Common Patterns in Antecedents
Look for repeated situations that occur immediately before the behavior. These may include:
Demands or work tasks
Denied access
Loss of attention
Transitions
Unstructured time
Environmental triggers (noise, visual clutter, temperature)
To analyze antecedents, ask yourself:
Where does the behavior consistently occur?
When is it most likely to happen (time of day or activity)?
Who is present when it happens?
What is happening in the environment at that moment?
You’re not looking for one perfect trigger—you’re looking for patterns across time.
Identify Maintaining Consequences
Consequences tell you whether a behavior is:
Reinforced (likely to happen again)
Punished (likely to happen less)
Look for repeated outcomes following the behavior:
Does the learner consistently gain attention?
Do adults remove a demand?
Does the learner re-access a preferred item?
Does the situation end (escape)?
Does the adult engage in argument, reasoning, or negotiation?
If the consequence consistently gives the learner what they wanted, it’s functioning as reinforcement—even if that wasn’t the adult’s intention.
Use Setting Events to Explain “Inconsistent” Behavior
Sometimes behavior appears unpredictable. Setting events help explain why a learner reacts differently to the same antecedent on different days.
Common setting events include:
Fatigue
Hunger
Illness
Medication changes
Stressful events
Changes in routine
Rapport with the interventionist
Sensory overload earlier in the day
Setting events don’t cause the behavior, but they alter the learner’s sensitivity to triggers.
Ask the Right Questions to Interpret the Data
To make sense of patterns, compare the most frequent antecedents and consequences:
Questions about Antecedents
What consistently happens before the behavior?
Is the setting predictable (time, place, activity)?
Are there signs of avoidance, frustration, or overstimulation?
Questions about Consequences
How do adults typically respond?
Does the response remove something aversive?
Does the response provide something desirable?
After the consequence, does the behavior stop, escalate, or repeat?
Questions about Setting Events
Were any sleep, medical, or household changes present that day?
What stressors or disruptions occurred earlier?
Is rapport influencing responsiveness?
These questions transform individual data points into meaningful behavioral patterns.
Putting It Together: Analyzing the Full Behavior Chain
Your goal is to determine:
What triggers the behavior
What maintains the behavior
When and why the behavior is more likely to occur
Which conditions strengthen or weaken appropriate responses
If antecedents, behavior, and consequences repeat in a predictable sequence, you’ve likely identified the maintaining variables.
If the pattern is unclear, collect more data—or consider using structured tools such as interviews, checklists, or direct observations.
When to Use ABC Data for Behavior Reduction vs. Skill Building
ABC data isn’t just for reducing challenging behavior. It also helps identify:
What motivates the learner
What conditions evoke correct responses
Whether prompts influence responding
Whether reinforcement is strong enough
For skill acquisition, look for:
Antecedents that reliably evoke the desired skill
Consequences that increase the skill
Competing consequences that may interrupt learning
When skill acquisition stalls, revisiting ABC data often reveals the barrier.
Avoid Common Analysis Mistakes
Watch out for these traps:
Jumping to conclusions based on a single event
Focusing on the child instead of the environment
Ignoring consequences that accidentally reinforce behavior
Overlooking setting events
Assuming the “most dramatic” instance represents the typical pattern
Effective analysis requires looking across many events—not just the memorable ones.
When ABC Data Isn’t Enough
While ABC data reveals patterns, some situations require additional tools:
Interviews
Rating scales
Scatterplots
Direct functional analyses (FA or PFA)
High-frequency behavior tracking
If the function remains unclear, combine ABC data with other assessment methods to strengthen your hypothesis.
How ABC Data Helps Determine the Function of Behavior
Once you’ve analyzed patterns in your ABC data, the next step is determining the function of the behavior—what the learner is trying to achieve. All behavior happens for a reason, and when a pattern repeats often enough, ABC data begins to reveal what the learner “gets” or “avoids” through the behavior.
Identifying function is essential because it guides every part of a Behavior Intervention Plan (BIP), from antecedent strategies to teaching replacement skills. When you understand what maintains a behavior, you can design a plan that meets the learner’s needs in safer, more adaptive ways.
The Four Primary Functions of Behavior
While behavior can be complex, research shows that most behaviors fall into one or more of these categories:
1. Attention
Behavior that leads to interaction from others—talking, scolding, laughing, comforting, reasoning, or even brief eye contact.
Signs in your ABC data:
Behavior occurs most when adults are busy
Consequence consistently includes verbal responses
Attention—even reprimands—temporarily stops the behavior
2. Escape or Avoidance
Behavior that helps the learner delay, escape, or avoid something unpleasant.
Look for patterns such as:
Demands consistently precede behavior
Adults remove, delay, or modify tasks
Learner calms once the demand is removed
3. Access to Tangibles or Activities
Behavior that results in receiving something desirable: toys, food, electronics, preferred activities, or special privileges.
Patterns may include:
Behavior occurs when access is restricted
Adult gives the item/activity afterward
Learner rapidly stops behavior once the item is received
4. Automatic (Sensory) Reinforcement
Behavior that creates its own reinforcing experience—movement, pressure, sound, or visual stimulation.
Look for:
Behavior occurs across settings
Consequences have little effect
Behavior happens even without social interaction
Using ABC Data to Narrow Down the Function
ABC data doesn’t always give a definitive answer, but it provides a strong hypothesis. Look for repeated connections across events:
Does the same antecedent repeatedly appear before the behavior?
Does the behavior reliably achieve the same outcome?
Do specific consequences make the behavior stop, escalate, or recur later in the day?
A pattern is emerging when the same antecedent–behavior–consequence chain appears multiple times.
When ABC Data Is Enough—and When It Isn’t
Sometimes ABC data provides clear evidence of function. For example:
Every instance occurs when adult attention is unavailable
Every consequence provides immediate attention
Behavior stops as soon as attention is delivered
In these situations, you can confidently move forward with a function-based intervention.
However, ABC data may not be enough when:
The behavior is low frequency
The setting is highly variable
Consequences are inconsistent
Multiple functions seem likely
Behavior is dangerous or high-risk
In these cases, additional tools—such as interviews, standardized questionnaires, or a functional analysis (FA/PFA)—may be required to confirm the function.
Why Misidentifying Function Leads to Ineffective Plans
When the wrong function is assumed:
Reinforcement procedures may accidentally strengthen the behavior
Consequences intended as “discipline” may serve as powerful reinforcers
Replacement skills won’t meet the learner’s actual needs
The plan will be inconsistently implemented because it won’t feel effective
Function is the backbone of behavior intervention. Even the strongest evidence-based interventions fail when used for the wrong function.
Using Function to Guide Intervention
Once you’ve identified the likely function, you can:
Select the most appropriate antecedent strategies
Develop functionally equivalent replacement behaviors
Create effective consequence procedures
Reduce reinforcement for the target behavior
Increase reinforcement for more appropriate alternatives
ABC data allows the intervention to align with the learner’s motivation—creating a plan that is ethical, individualized, and far more effective.
Using ABC Data to Strengthen Skill Development
Most people associate ABC data with reducing challenging behavior, but it’s equally powerful for improving skill acquisition. When a learner struggles to master a new skill—or performs it inconsistently—ABC data helps uncover why the skill isn’t sticking.
Skill development depends on predictable, well-designed teaching contingencies. ABC data reveals whether those contingencies are clear, consistent, and meaningful for the learner. The more you understand what evokes the desired behavior and what reinforces it, the more efficiently you can teach and maintain new skills.
How ABC Data Supports Skill Acquisition
ABC data helps answer key questions that directly affect learning:
Does a clear cue (SD) reliably evoke the correct response?
Are prompts overshadowing the SD?
Is reinforcement strong enough for the learner to respond?
Are unintended consequences weakening the skill?
Is the learner motivated to perform the skill at all?
These insights allow you to refine your teaching procedures so the learner can perform the skill independently and in more natural situations.
Using Antecedents to Strengthen Learning
Antecedents aren’t just triggers for challenging behavior—they’re also the cues that evoke correct responses in teaching.
ABC data helps you determine:
Whether the SD is clear, consistent, and presented the same way each time
Whether competing stimuli (noise, distractions, unclear instructions) interfere
Whether the learner is becoming prompt dependent because prompts overshadow the SD
Whether motivation or readiness impacts performance
For skill acquisition:
Ensure the SD is simple, consistent, and salient
Fade prompts systematically
Adjust the teaching environment to reduce competing stimuli
Confirm that the learner recognizes the SD as a signal for reinforcement
When the skill doesn’t occur, ABC data helps you pinpoint whether the antecedent conditions need adjustment.
Using Consequences to Strengthen Learning
To build a new skill, the consequence must:
Occur immediately, and
Increase the likelihood of the skill happening again
ABC data helps you verify:
Whether reinforcement is delivered consistently
Whether reinforcement actually increases the skill
Whether the learner is satiated on the reinforcer
Whether lower-quality or delayed reinforcement is weakening progress
Whether competing consequences (e.g., attention during errors) overshadow correct-response reinforcement
If the learner isn’t progressing, ABC data often reveals that reinforcement is:
Too delayed
Too inconsistent
Too weak
Not aligned with the learner’s actual preferences
Adjusting the consequence side of the contingency often unlocks rapid progress.
Identifying Hidden Barriers to Learning
Patterns in ABC data commonly reveal barriers such as:
Prompt Dependence
The learner responds only when a specific prompt is present—not to the actual SD.
Competing Reinforcement
Accidental reinforcement of incorrect responses (e.g., attention, escape).
Weak Motivational Conditions
Reinforcers are no longer effective or don’t outweigh the effort of responding.
Over-Prompting or Under-Prompting
Too much prompting blocks independence; too little prevents success.
Environmental Interference
Noise, transitions, or difficult materials disrupt responding.
By identifying the barrier early, you avoid weeks (or months) of ineffective teaching.
ABC Data Helps Prevent Misinterpretation of “Noncompliance”
When a learner does not respond to a teaching trial, the common assumption is “noncompliance.”
ABC data often reveals a more accurate explanation:
The SD wasn’t clear
The learner didn’t understand the instruction
The reinforcement wasn’t meaningful
A setting event was affecting behavior
The response had not been taught thoroughly
Competing consequences strengthened an alternative behavior
Seeing the full contingency helps you adjust the teaching strategy with compassion and precision.
Using ABC Data to Maintain Skills Over Time
Once a skill is mastered, ABC data continues to support:
Generalization across people, settings, and materials
Identifying situations in which the skill breaks down
Evaluating whether reinforcement must be thinned or strengthened
Determining whether additional prompting is needed
Ensuring natural reinforcement maintains the skill
Maintenance failures are often antecedent- or consequence-related—not learner-related.
ABC data helps pinpoint exactly where the breakdown occurs.
When to Revisit ABC Data During Skill Acquisition
Return to ABC review when:
A skill plateaus
Errors suddenly increase
The learner resists participating
Prompts are difficult to fade
Reinforcement loses effectiveness
Generalization isn't occurring
Instead of guessing why the skill is breaking down, ABC data gives you an objective, consistent lens to re-evaluate the teaching conditions.
Common Mistakes When Using ABC Data (and How to Avoid Them)
Even when practitioners understand the ABC model, the quality of the data determines whether it can be used to draw accurate conclusions. Unfortunately, many teams unknowingly record ABC data in ways that distort the true pattern of behavior. Recognizing these common pitfalls helps you avoid misleading information and write more effective, ethical intervention plans.
1. Recording Interpretations Instead of Observable Facts
One of the most frequent mistakes is writing what you think happened instead of what you saw.
Poor ABC Data:
A: He got frustrated.
B: He tried to manipulate me.
C: I ignored the tantrum.
Better ABC Data:
A: I said, “Clean up the blocks.”
B: He threw 3 blocks and yelled, “No!”
C: I turned away and continued putting toys on the shelf.
Why this matters:
Interpretations introduce bias. ABC data must describe observable events so other practitioners can reliably analyze it.
2. Ending the “A” Too Early
Many people mistakenly record only the single action immediately before the behavior—but antecedents often include a chain of events.
Example:
A: “Put your shoes on.”
→ But the real antecedent chain included:
• woke up late
• rushed morning routine
• sibling took his favorite cereal
• parent used a stern tone
How to avoid this:
Teach observers to capture both the setting events and relevant context.
3. Over-Attributing Behavior to Attention
This is the most common ABC mistake across home, school, and clinic settings.
Why?
Because any response from an adult—even a quick “Stop!”—technically counts as attention, so ABC data often appears to suggest attention-maintained behavior even when that isn’t the function.
The problem:
This can lead to wildly inaccurate FBAs and ineffective treatment plans.
How to avoid this:
Look at the pattern, not a single event
Cross-check with interviews, scatterplots, and skill deficits
Ask whether attention was given because of safety, not because it reinforces
In many cases, “attention” shows up in ABC data simply because adults feel obligated to respond—not because attention is the maintaining reinforcer.
4. Overlooking Setting Events
Setting events dramatically influence behavior, but they aren’t always recorded.
Common examples:
Poor sleep
Hunger
Transitions earlier in the day
Medication changes
Social conflict
Overstimulation
Why this matters:
Ignoring setting events leads to misinterpretation. The antecedent might not be the actual trigger—only the final “spark.”
Solution:
Include a simple setting event checklist for observers to complete whenever possible.
5. Collecting Too Few Data Points
One or two instances rarely provide enough information to identify a reliable pattern.
Inadequate:
A single event
Better:
Two or three events
Best:
Multiple events across settings, activities, and days
Rule of thumb:
You need enough data to see consistency.
6. Staging or Provoking Behavior to Capture ABCs
Some practitioners intentionally create conditions designed to “make the behavior happen.”
This is problematic because:
It can escalate behavior
It can create ethical concerns
It produces artificial data
It misrepresents natural contingencies
What to do instead:
Train caregivers and staff to capture ABCs when behavior naturally occurs
Use video recordings (when appropriate and permitted)
Supplement with interviews if natural observation is limited
7. Focusing Only on Severe Behaviors
It’s common to record ABCs only when a major behavior occurs, but minor or moderate instances often reveal the clearer pattern.
Example:
Escalation to aggression might be preceded by:
whining
pacing
verbal refusals
non-compliance
Solution:
Teach observers to record early warning signs—not just the peak behavior.
8. Ignoring the Effect of Delayed Consequences
ABC data should focus on what happens within 30 seconds of the behavior, but observers often record consequences that occur minutes later.
Why this matters:
Delayed consequences typically do not influence immediate behavior patterns.
Fix:
Train observers to record immediate responses only, not disciplinary actions that occur much later.
9. Forgetting to Record What Didn’t Happen
Sometimes the most important consequence is one that was withheld.
Example:
A: Denied iPad
B: Screaming
C: Parent did not return the iPad
This can confirm that access to tangibles is not reinforcing the behavior.
Recording omissions is just as important as recording actions.
10. Not Aligning ABC Data With Skill Deficits
Certain behaviors look like they serve a function when they may actually reveal a missing skill.
Examples:
Lack of communication skills
Poor tolerance for delay
Limited discrimination skills
Weak executive functioning
Why this matters:
If the data appears to show escape, yet the learner simply cannot complete the task, the intervention must focus on teaching—not escape extinction.
Conclusion
ABC data is one of the most powerful tools in Applied Behavior Analysis—when it’s collected accurately and interpreted thoughtfully. By examining what happens before and after behavior across many events, you can uncover meaningful patterns that reveal a learner’s motivation, guide the development of effective BIPs, and strengthen skill acquisition.
But ABC data is only as useful as the methods behind it. Avoiding common mistakes—such as over-attributing behavior to attention, interpreting instead of observing, or collecting too few data points—ensures your analysis truly reflects the learner’s needs. When used well, ABC data promotes compassionate, individualized, function-based interventions that lead to meaningful and lasting change.
References
Hanley, G. P., Jin, C. S., Vanselow, N. R., & Hanratty, L. A. (2014). Producing meaningful improvements in problem behavior of children with autism via synthesized analyses and treatments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(1), 16-36.
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2(1-2), 3-20.
Lanovaz, M. J., Argumedes, M., Roy, D., Duquette, J. R., & Watkins, N. (2013). Using ABC narrative recording to identify the function of problem behavior: A pilot study. Research in developmental disabilities, 34(9), 2734-2742.
Lerman, D. C., Hovanetz, A., Strobel, M., & Tetreault, A. (2009). Accuracy of teacher-collected descriptive analysis data: A comparison of narrative and structured recording formats. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 157-172.
Magito McLaughlin, D., & Carr, E. G. (2005). Quality of rapport as a setting event for problem behavior: Assessment and intervention. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7(2), 68–91. doi:10.1177/10983007050070020401.
Martens, B. K., DiGennaro, F. D., Reed, D. D., Szczech, F. M., & Rosenthal, B. D. (2008). Contingency space analysis: An alternative method for identifying contingent relations from observational data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41(1), 69-81.
Pence, S. T., Roscoe, E. M., Bourret, J. C., & Ahearn, W. H. (2009). Relative contributions of three descriptive methods: Implications for behavioral assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(2), 425-446.
Ramey, D., Healy, O., Lang, R., Gormley, L., & Pullen, N. (2019). Mood as a Dependent Variable in Behavioral Interventions for Individuals with ASD: A Systematic Review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 6, 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-019-00169-8
